[TrunkCom] Re: FCC says "250D" has NOT been type accepted.

Marcel [email protected]
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:02:37 -0400


Correct-

Curt Chambers wrote:

> I hesitate to jump into this, however ... isn't it completely normal that
> the base and the handheld would have two unique ID numbers? I thought the
> primary purpose of FCC certification is to determine the devices impact on
> the radio spectrum - are spurious emissions within tolerances for the band,
> tx power within spec - all that kind of "stuff" relative to the device being
> tested. Hence the need for approved testing labs with calibrated spectrum
> analyzers, etc for test results.
>
> Frankly, when it was originally posted that both devices were going to be
> covered under the same ID I knew that almost couldn't possibly be true given
> the completely different RF characteristics of the units (handheld case & PC
> board/chipset vs mobile case & PC board/chipset). With this most recent post
> I REALLY have a hard time believing Uniden was somehow under the impression
> that both units could be covered by the same ID. Uniden applies for many FCC
> ID's per year for a variety of electronic devices they manufacture, I would
> think they have the procedure down pretty good at this point.
>
> I suspect this is NOT a big mystery - the 785 was approved first as they
> submitted it first & its just a slight variation of the 780 which may have
> also accelerated the process. The 250D was almost certainly submitted 2nd I
> would think.
>
> Just my two cents...
>
> Curt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: JERRY NONE
> Cc: JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON; [email protected]; Harry Marnell;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] Re: FCC says "250D" has NOT been type accepted.
>
> Jerry 9-11 has nothing to do with it. Where are you getting your info from?
>
> JERRY NONE wrote:
>
> > They might be MORE catious after 09/11/2001.
> > Then again, I don't get it.  If the Hand Held and the
> > Base / Mobile have the same features; it really
> > shouldn't make a difference.
> > --- JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think that it will eventually get excepted just
> > > like the other radios
> > > have.  Has this ever happened before with this kind
> > > of thing with new
> > > radios coming out?  Does anyone think this will
> > > delay the release date for
> > > either radio?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, JERRY NONE wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, no.  Here we go again.  Maybe because it is a
> > > hand
> > > > held unit and they do NOT want anybody having a
> > > > digital capable hand held unit.
> > > >
> > > > Lets face it.  Out of all the radio scanners out
> > > > there, which one can do triple duty as a hand
> > > held,
> > > > mobile, or base?  Well it is the hand held, no
> > > doubt
> > > > about it.  10-4?!?!?!?!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Harry Marnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Today (9/17/2002) I spoke with the chief of the
> > > > > FCC's Laboratory Division, who
> > > > > told me the handheld digital scanner has NOT
> > > been
> > > > > type accepted.
> > > > >
> > > > > See
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > http://www.snowcrest.net/marnells/digital-scanner.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > harry
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > FAQ:    http://plaws.net/scan/scan-l.txt | NO
> > > > > COMMERCIAL POSTS!
> > > > > Signoff:     send 'unsub SCAN-L' to
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >    This LISTSERV(tm) facility provided free of
> > > > > charge by the
> > > > >                     University of Arkansas
> > > > >           and is subject to termination without
> > > > notice
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > > http://news.yahoo.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > mailto:[email protected]
> > > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > mailto:[email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > http://news.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>
> --
>     "NEXTEL1 IT'S NOT JUST NEXTEL"
> Subscribe to Nextel1: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL1
>
>   "NEXTEL2 FOR iDEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS"
> Subscribe to Nextel2: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL2
>
>   "WIRELESS FORUM HOMELAND SECURITY GROUP"
>      The Complete Resource for Wireless Homeland Security.
> Subscribe to WFHSG:  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/WFHSG
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom

--
    "NEXTEL1 IT'S NOT JUST NEXTEL"
Subscribe to Nextel1: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL1

  "NEXTEL2 FOR iDEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS"
Subscribe to Nextel2: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL2

  "WIRELESS FORUM HOMELAND SECURITY GROUP"
     The Complete Resource for Wireless Homeland Security.
Subscribe to WFHSG:  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/WFHSG