[TrunkCom] Re: FCC says "250D" has NOT been type accepted.

Tue, 17 Sep 2002 20:37:51 -0400 (EDT)

They would have two different IDS, but they do the same thing, but the
250D of course is more compact then the 785D.  Will one mave more
functions then the other in addition to digital?

On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Curt Chambers wrote:

> I hesitate to jump into this, however ... isn't it completely normal that
> the base and the handheld would have two unique ID numbers? I thought the
> primary purpose of FCC certification is to determine the devices impact on
> the radio spectrum - are spurious emissions within tolerances for the band,
> tx power within spec - all that kind of "stuff" relative to the device being
> tested. Hence the need for approved testing labs with calibrated spectrum
> analyzers, etc for test results.
>
> Frankly, when it was originally posted that both devices were going to be
> covered under the same ID I knew that almost couldn't possibly be true given
> the completely different RF characteristics of the units (handheld case & PC
> board/chipset vs mobile case & PC board/chipset). With this most recent post
> I REALLY have a hard time believing Uniden was somehow under the impression
> that both units could be covered by the same ID. Uniden applies for many FCC
> ID's per year for a variety of electronic devices they manufacture, I would
> think they have the procedure down pretty good at this point.
>
> I suspect this is NOT a big mystery - the 785 was approved first as they
> submitted it first & its just a slight variation of the 780 which may have
> also accelerated the process. The 250D was almost certainly submitted 2nd I
> would think.
>
> Just my two cents...
>
> Curt
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: JERRY NONE
> Cc: JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON; [email protected]; Harry Marnell;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] Re: FCC says "250D" has NOT been type accepted.
>
>
> Jerry 9-11 has nothing to do with it. Where are you getting your info from?
>
> JERRY NONE wrote:
>
> > They might be MORE catious after 09/11/2001.
> > Then again, I don't get it.  If the Hand Held and the
> > Base / Mobile have the same features; it really
> > shouldn't make a difference.
> > --- JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think that it will eventually get excepted just
> > > like the other radios
> > > have.  Has this ever happened before with this kind
> > > of thing with new
> > > radios coming out?  Does anyone think this will
> > > delay the release date for
> > > either radio?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, JERRY NONE wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, no.  Here we go again.  Maybe because it is a
> > > hand
> > > > held unit and they do NOT want anybody having a
> > > > digital capable hand held unit.
> > > >
> > > > Lets face it.  Out of all the radio scanners out
> > > > there, which one can do triple duty as a hand
> > > held,
> > > > mobile, or base?  Well it is the hand held, no
> > > doubt
> > > > about it.  10-4?!?!?!?!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Harry Marnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Today (9/17/2002) I spoke with the chief of the
> > > > > FCC's Laboratory Division, who
> > > > > told me the handheld digital scanner has NOT
> > > been
> > > > > type accepted.
> > > > >
> > > > > See
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > http://www.snowcrest.net/marnells/digital-scanner.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > harry
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > FAQ:    http://plaws.net/scan/scan-l.txt | NO
> > > > > COMMERCIAL POSTS!
> > > > > Signoff:     send 'unsub SCAN-L' to
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >    This LISTSERV(tm) facility provided free of
> > > > > charge by the
> > > > >                     University of Arkansas
> > > > >           and is subject to termination without
> > > > notice
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > > http://news.yahoo.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > mailto:[email protected]
> > > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > mailto:[email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > http://news.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>
> --
>     "NEXTEL1 IT'S NOT JUST NEXTEL"
> Subscribe to Nextel1: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL1
>
>   "NEXTEL2 FOR iDEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS"
> Subscribe to Nextel2: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL2
>
>   "WIRELESS FORUM HOMELAND SECURITY GROUP"
>      The Complete Resource for Wireless Homeland Security.
> Subscribe to WFHSG:  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/WFHSG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>