[Yaesu] 1000DFilter Choice
Nate Bargmann
[email protected]
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:15:17 -0600
* [email protected] <[email protected]> [2003 Nov 27 08:07 -0600]:
> First, thank you for the response on the serial numbers. This radio is a '98
> build. The seller claimed a 2000 purchase, so I guess it was on the shelf for
> a while.
That certainly can happen. I bought my '920 in May of 2000, brand new,
from a small local dealer. It wound up being a 7K, which made me a bit
upset, but I figured with a 1 year warranty I could fix it if need be.
After 3.5 years I'm happy to say that my '920 exhibited none of the
problems the early production runs exhibited.
> I see that I can still buy the Yaesu 250 CW filter for it. Has there been any
> comment here as to weather the INRAD filter is better or worse?
> I am usually buying now with the idea of having to selling someday. I would
> like to hear if there is some stigma attached to non-Yaesu optional equipment
>
> I know INRAD has a good reputation and also still see Collins guys paying big
> money for 40 year old original filters to put in their A-4's.
I've had excellent results with the INRAD filters. In general they have
better specs than the factory options and usually are priced about the
same.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Internet | [email protected] | free since January 1998.
Location | Bremen, Kansas USA EM19ov | "Debian, the choice of
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org