[Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...

Steve Jones [email protected]
Sat, 16 Feb 2002 16:52:31 -0500


Good Brian, now do you have any real feedback to the subject asked. FT1000
radios. That is the subject, not what someone else said about something that
should be discussed on the Icom reflector. Thank you...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Eller" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...


> Oops, Murphy is alive and well... I don't know what I hit to send that as
I
> was typing; I guess it just proves I'm human like everybody else...
anyhow,
> as I was starting to say, I read what John said:
>
> "When you compare receiver audio the Pro wins hands down. The pro has the
> ability to hear from 100 to 3.6k  ....... the FT- 1000 has narrow ssb
> crystal filters that are setup for contesters and are about 2.3k wide
total
> with an effective audio response of only 300 to 2.6k at the -6db points on
> Xmit or receive depending on the carrier point alignment on that
particular
> rig...I have had a measured both and the Icom has superior fidelity !!!
> You need to learn how to use the pro's digital filter !! And that is
coming
> from a loyal yaesu man
>
>  73's John"
>
> I've read this several times, and I don't see an attack there. I guess
it's
> certainly possible that different people can/will take the same statement
> different ways, but myself, I didn't interpret anything said there as a
> flame.
>
> One of the things that really attracted me to Ham Radio was the friendly,
> helpful attitude of other hams. Myself, John's statement about learning
the
> digital filters was an attempt to help you improve the performance of your
> radio, not to flame you... but, as we've both said, we need to drop this
> subject, and get on with the purpose of this reflector, so I'll step off
my
> soapbox.
>
> 73's to all,
>
> -= Brian
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:26 PM
> Subject: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
>
>
> > response to John Bolduc but I do not appreciate personal attacks and I
> > should have looked for his E-mail address to respond instead of the
> > reflector. It will not happen again and again I apologize for how I did
> it,
> > not what I said. Let's get back to the subject and request which was
about
> > Yaesu, not Icom radios. Thanks and 73, Steve, NX1G
> >
> > Have a great day, because if you don't someone else will!!!
> >
> > 73, Steve, NX1G
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Yaesu mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>