[Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 16:18:36 -0600

I think Brian gave you some 'real feedback', its up to
you to see it.
van

At 04:52 PM 2/16/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Good Brian, now do you have any real feedback to the subject asked. FT1000
>radios. That is the subject, not what someone else said about something that
>should be discussed on the Icom reflector. Thank you...
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brian Eller" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
>
>
>> Oops, Murphy is alive and well... I don't know what I hit to send that as
>I
>> was typing; I guess it just proves I'm human like everybody else...
>anyhow,
>> as I was starting to say, I read what John said:
>>
>> "When you compare receiver audio the Pro wins hands down. The pro has the
>> ability to hear from 100 to 3.6k  ....... the FT- 1000 has narrow ssb
>> crystal filters that are setup for contesters and are about 2.3k wide
>total
>> with an effective audio response of only 300 to 2.6k at the -6db points on
>> Xmit or receive depending on the carrier point alignment on that
>particular
>> rig...I have had a measured both and the Icom has superior fidelity !!!
>> You need to learn how to use the pro's digital filter !! And that is
>coming
>> from a loyal yaesu man
>>
>>  73's John"
>>
>> I've read this several times, and I don't see an attack there. I guess
>it's
>> certainly possible that different people can/will take the same statement
>> different ways, but myself, I didn't interpret anything said there as a
>> flame.
>>
>> One of the things that really attracted me to Ham Radio was the friendly,
>> helpful attitude of other hams. Myself, John's statement about learning
>the
>> digital filters was an attempt to help you improve the performance of your
>> radio, not to flame you... but, as we've both said, we need to drop this
>> subject, and get on with the purpose of this reflector, so I'll step off
>my
>> soapbox.
>>
>> 73's to all,
>>
>> -= Brian
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:26 PM
>> Subject: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
>>
>>
>> > response to John Bolduc but I do not appreciate personal attacks and I
>> > should have looked for his E-mail address to respond instead of the
>> > reflector. It will not happen again and again I apologize for how I did
>> it,
>> > not what I said. Let's get back to the subject and request which was
>about
>> > Yaesu, not Icom radios. Thanks and 73, Steve, NX1G
>> >
>> > Have a great day, because if you don't someone else will!!!
>> >
>> > 73, Steve, NX1G
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Yaesu mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Yaesu mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Yaesu mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>