[TrunkCom] rebanding starting in Michigan

[Jeff Kenyon]

With EDACS and LTR you have to have them in LCN order.  With Moto on the
96 you'll have to do some tweeking of the channel settings.  With P-25
from what I've heard all the data is included in the control channel to
track the systems from what i've heard.  However, if you have p-25 on
VHF/uHF with the 96 you still have to use table settings for them.





On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, JERRY NONE wrote:

> My understanding is that MOTO used the FCC Channel Plan.
> I think that is why Control Channel Only Mode worked and still works for MOTO TRS Systems.
> Once Rebanding is done, the old Channel Plan will be trashed and the new one will be established.  The new Channel Plan, if I am correct is 15 Megacycles lower.
> On the other hand ECADS and LTR should NOT be affected.  Why?  Because I believe that EDACS and LTR never used the Channel Plan.
> So the older Radi oScanners when it comes to MOTO will be useless but as for EDACS and LTR they hould be okay.
> Now as for Provoice. OpenSky, Multi-Net, Passport, and MPT, your guess is as good as mine.
>
> Hee are some links for you:
>
> http://www.advancedspecialties.net/radio-scanner-faq.htm
>
> http://monitor-post.blogspot.com/2006/06/800-mhz-rebanding-and-uniden-scanners.html
>
> http://www.radioshack.com/sm-scanner-rebanding--ra-Scanners12.html
>
> http://www.800ta.org/content/faqs/rpp.asp
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://ladysheltie.slide.com/
>
>
> --- On Tue, 9/16/08, Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org>
> > Subject: [TrunkCom] rebanding starting in Michigan
> > To: scan-l at listserv.UARK.edu
> > Cc: trunkcom at mailman.qth.net
> > Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 8:13 PM
> > Hi everyone, rebanding will soon start in Michigan with the
> > various trunkd systems there.  I don't know what has
> > started already, but Eastern Wayne County will be rebanded
> > soon.  I don't have a time line, bu or older scanners,
> > what is the best way to track this system with say a Pro-96
> > or 250D?  What about other rebanded systems with older
> > units?
> <SNIPPED>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>