[TrunkCom] JIWN

[Jeff Kenyon]

I know how that goes.  It will be interesting to see what technology will
exist radio or otherwise by that time.  I never thought as a kid when
scanner monitoring and watching all them flashing lights going back and
forth I'd be concerned with things like trunktracking and whether or not
something can be monitored and things like that.





On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Arthur-Bryan E. Phelps wrote:

> I cannot really answer your question, Jeff. But your original post
> referenced a possible effect on local LE entities. The answer to that
> question is "most likely no". This is a federal initiative. Dave is correct
> in his analysis of the architecture of such an endeavor. Although government
> agencies are purchasing standard P25 systems and pro-voice and whatever, I'm
> certain by 2021 the technology available will raise the bar on anything that
> exists today. Relax a bit. This is government, remember. Nothing is carved
> in stone.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:trunkcom-bounces+aphelps=enter.net at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:15 PM
> To: Discussion of Monitoring Trunk Radio Systems
> Subject: Re: [TrunkCom] JIWN
>
> Hi Dave and the group.  What is the P-25 JIWN system on the west coast in
> Oregon and Washington being used for then?  I had always wondered when it
> would be expanded to the rest of the country.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, David T. Stark wrote:
>
> > > Hi everyone, I just saw another update on radioreference.com about
> > > the JIWN trunked system, and I guess that by 2021 it will be a
> > > nation wide trunked system.  Does anyone know if eventually state
> > > and local governments will be joining the system, and what about the
> > > federal government's switch to all ProVoice?  I had heard a lot of
> > > different things saying that they will be going ProVoice with regard
> > > to the federal government and another thing was OpenSky and a few other
> things like that.
> >
> > Referring to JIWN as a "nationwide" system is a misnomer.  Various
> > standalone systems (both trunked and conventional) used by federal
> > agencies and the military around the country are going to be "part of"
> JIWN.
> > However, this is not a single radio system in any way resembling, for
> > example, a Motorola SmartZone system.
> >
> > There is likely going to be a way to link these individual systems
> > together temporarily if some situation requires it, probably via IP at the
> back end.
> > In that sense, there is a potential to hook them all up and create a
> > "nationwide" radio network, but in actual practice there is no reason
> > for that to happen.
> >
> >
> > David T. Stark
> > M.A. Criminal Justice / ACJS / CJEANYS / ISI Adjunct Instructor of
> > Criminal Justice, HVCC, Troy, NY ARES / RACES / Skywarn / QCWA NF2G /
> > IBN-289 (ex-N2CSB, KYR-7128, KNY2DJ, RCMA NY-172, NYSING-01) FEMA
> > certifications: IS-100, 200, 700, 800
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>