[TrunkCom] while we are on the subject of encryption
JETorres
torres.jet at gmail.com
Mon Nov 6 19:55:31 EST 2006
On Nov 6, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Scott Berringer wrote:
> Federal entities using ProVoice? Hmmm........ Okay. Considering all
> the P-25 systems that are currently popping up on federal
> installations across the country as we speak. But, if they say so.....
EXACTLY! I agree with that.
If that is the case with ProVoice then what the heck is the point of
standards and open-source and trying to achieve "transparent"
Interoperability? Plus as far as I know, all the money grants
"raining" from Homeland Security do stipulate at least some P-25
requirements in order to get the grants.
All reasons related to our hobby aside, this is some serious fraud,
waste and abuse of tax payers money to allow so many proprietary AND
incompatible technologies to be used as primary communications
systems for Public Safety, especially with all the money, time and
effort already spent NATIONWIDE on P25 related technology that will
go down the drain and we all end up even worse than today as far as
efficiently communicating during emergency events.
And as usual who gets it in the end? (no pun intended) The tax
payers, who might possibly even pay with their lives when these
egotistic agencies can't communicate during an emergency.......
More information about the TrunkCom
mailing list