[TrunkCom] new kind of EDACS in use in Maryland

[JERRY NONE]

Hi Jeff,

Since you folks are so close to the border
(Land wise, since we here in Ohio are too but our
border is in the midddle of Lake Eire.) are there any
interference problems from the Ontarian side into
Michigan and is there any interference from the
Michiganian side into Ontario?

Also are there any Ontarian users of the MPSCS?

Would any of the Michiganian users be using Ontario's
Province Wide Multi-Site TRS?

--- Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org> wrote:

> I guess so, Here in Michigan with the MPSCS as being
> very influential and
> users getting various grants from homeland security
> people are making the
> move to MPSCS as quickly as possible and for those
> who are not there yet
> for whatever reason there are a lot of patches to
> VHF/UHF and other
> trunking systems.  Across the pond however, in
> Ontario we have another
> story with about a 50-50 split between Motorola and
> EDACS, both AEGIS and
> ProVoice.
> 	I'd still be interested to know if the control
> channels for both
> EDACS with ESK and this new EDACS using LCN-0 is any
> different from EDACS
> wide or narrow.  I know that narrow banded EDACS has
> a hallow type sound
> to it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, JERRY NONE wrote:
> 
> > I would like the see that happen on my Pro-92B,
> > tracking Pro-Voice that is but I would NOT want
> any
> > Pro-Voice Systems in the area.
> >
> > I guess that is taking the good with the bad, eh?
> >
> > --- dmccorm at charter.net wrote:
> >
> > > The reason I mentioned the PRO-92 (firmware
> version
> > > 1.00) is because it will actually track the
> ProVoice
> > > talkgroups (without digital decode of course),
> but
> > > the 93-97 will not track the ProVoice
> talkgroups,
> > > only the analog ones.
> > >
> > > ---- shawn collier <toes1976 at sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
> > > > You could probably also do this with the Pro
> 95/96
> > > 2096 and whatever the 95's sister is.  This
> could
> > > also probably be done with a 93/20xx.  Do any of
> the
> > > uniden's start the bank at 0?
> > > >
> > > >   Just input it into 000 or 100 or something
> like
> > > that.
> > > >
> > > >   Hey you never know they might come out with
> > > something for the Pro 96 for provoice in a flash
> no
> > > doubt as it's cheaper to flash then to build a
> new
> > > one.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   shawn
> > > >   formerly toes1976 at aol.com
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org> wrote:
> > > >   This aparently is something new where the
> > > control channel is LCN 0. i
> > > > guess the radio wil recognize it is EDACS but
> not
> > > track anything.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 dmccorm at charter.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Anyone try the original PRO-92 on it? Mine
> will
> > > display and track provoice talkgroups and track
> and
> > > "play" analog talkgroups, but the LCN is 1 on
> the
> > > local 800MHz system.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---- Jeff Kenyon wrote:
> > > > > > Hi everyone, I was reading on
> radioreference.c
> > > om about an EDACS system in
> > > > > > Maryland that was at first thought to have
> > > been using the ESK, but now
> > > > > > this is a new form of EDACS that lists the
> > > control channel as "LCN-0."
> > > > > > This is not ESK, but it will allow for
> more
> > > user IDS and maybe more talk
> > > > > > groups. Does anyone know what this is, and
> how
> > > it differs from
> > > > > > traditional EDACS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > Home:
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> >
> >
> > A Historical Wireless Telephone
> >
> >
>
http://www.polandbymail.com/item.asp?n=435476&d=368&b=1
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> 


A Historical Wireless Telephone 

http://www.polandbymail.com/item.asp?n=435476&d=368&b=1

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com