[TrunkCom] new kind of EDACS in use in Maryland

[Jeff Kenyon]

I guess so, Here in Michigan with the MPSCS as being very influential and
users getting various grants from homeland security people are making the
move to MPSCS as quickly as possible and for those who are not there yet
for whatever reason there are a lot of patches to VHF/UHF and other
trunking systems.  Across the pond however, in Ontario we have another
story with about a 50-50 split between Motorola and EDACS, both AEGIS and
ProVoice.
	I'd still be interested to know if the control channels for both
EDACS with ESK and this new EDACS using LCN-0 is any different from EDACS
wide or narrow.  I know that narrow banded EDACS has a hallow type sound
to it.





On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, JERRY NONE wrote:

> I would like the see that happen on my Pro-92B,
> tracking Pro-Voice that is but I would NOT want any
> Pro-Voice Systems in the area.
>
> I guess that is taking the good with the bad, eh?
>
> --- dmccorm at charter.net wrote:
>
> > The reason I mentioned the PRO-92 (firmware version
> > 1.00) is because it will actually track the ProVoice
> > talkgroups (without digital decode of course), but
> > the 93-97 will not track the ProVoice talkgroups,
> > only the analog ones.
> >
> > ---- shawn collier <toes1976 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > You could probably also do this with the Pro 95/96
> > 2096 and whatever the 95's sister is.  This could
> > also probably be done with a 93/20xx.  Do any of the
> > uniden's start the bank at 0?
> > >
> > >   Just input it into 000 or 100 or something like
> > that.
> > >
> > >   Hey you never know they might come out with
> > something for the Pro 96 for provoice in a flash no
> > doubt as it's cheaper to flash then to build a new
> > one.
> > >
> > >
> > >   shawn
> > >   formerly toes1976 at aol.com
> > >
> > > Jeff Kenyon <at649 at tcnet.org> wrote:
> > >   This aparently is something new where the
> > control channel is LCN 0. i
> > > guess the radio wil recognize it is EDACS but not
> > track anything.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 dmccorm at charter.net wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone try the original PRO-92 on it? Mine will
> > display and track provoice talkgroups and track and
> > "play" analog talkgroups, but the LCN is 1 on the
> > local 800MHz system.
> > > >
> > > > ---- Jeff Kenyon wrote:
> > > > > Hi everyone, I was reading on radioreference.c
> > om about an EDACS system in
> > > > > Maryland that was at first thought to have
> > been using the ESK, but now
> > > > > this is a new form of EDACS that lists the
> > control channel as "LCN-0."
> > > > > This is not ESK, but it will allow for more
> > user IDS and maybe more talk
> > > > > groups. Does anyone know what this is, and how
> > it differs from
> > > > > traditional EDACS?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > > > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > > > Home:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > Home:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > Home:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > Home:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
> >
>
>
> A Historical Wireless Telephone
>
> http://www.polandbymail.com/item.asp?n=435476&d=368&b=1
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:TrunkCom at mailman.qth.net
>