[TrunkCom] Re: Re: 9.6 K trunked systems

JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON [email protected]
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 18:16:28 -0400 (EDT)


I think that EDACS you can track that is wide does use 9.6 K with both
digital and analogue, and narrow that the control channel sounds hollow is
4.8 K.





On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, JERRY NONE wrote:

> Now that is an iteresting post.  Alright, in that case
> what about 9.6K EDACS and maybe MultiNet LTR?
> --- Ian Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> >          I realise we are in rumour only mode here
> > and no one "in the
> > know" will say anything here - But does anyone know
> > if Motorola have
> > patents better protecting 9600 baud control channels
> > than they have
> > on the 3600 baud control channels ?
> >
> >   I ask because patent and IP issues are the only
> > reason I can see
> > why Uniden's new scanner won't decode 9600 baud
> > control channels.
> > Technically if the receiver can decode the APCO25
> > digital voice
> > then it has the components required to decode a 9600
> > baud control
> > channel so I wonder if they are being prevented from
> > doing so by legal
> > problems - Comments anyone ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Yahoo! - We Remember
> 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>