[TrunkCom] Re: Re: 9.6 K trunked systems

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:07:48 -0400 (EDT)

I don't think that Trunker or any versions there of wan hanele 9.6 K.  For
the Michigan system though there are siteswwith talk group IDS, but short
of getting them from a Motorola radio which is har to come buy without
money I can't think of anything else.

On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Dewey wrote:

> On another note...
>
> These are big ifs, but if Trunker can handle 9.6 K (I don't remember), and
> the new digitals can be computer controlled (not just computer
> programmable), that would be a way around the rumored problem.  Let Trunker
> handle the control channel, and use the digital as the secondary scanner to
> monitor... wallah.  However, this is not much help to mobile users unless
> they tug a laptop around.
>
> Dewey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ian Wraith
> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 08:11
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TrunkCom] Re: Re: 9.6 K trunked systems
>
>
> Hi Folks
>          I realise we are in rumour only mode here and no one "in the
> know" will say anything here - But does anyone know if Motorola have
> patents better protecting 9600 baud control channels than they have
> on the 3600 baud control channels ?
>
>   I ask because patent and IP issues are the only reason I can see
> why Uniden's new scanner won't decode 9600 baud control channels.
> Technically if the receiver can decode the APCO25 digital voice
> then it has the components required to decode a 9600 baud control
> channel so I wonder if they are being prevented from doing so by legal
> problems - Comments anyone ?
>
> Regards
>
> Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>