[TrunkCom] 9.6 K trunked systems

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:03:08 -0400 (EDT)

That is what I am thinking.  I know it will be a challenge, but it is
better then nothing and just hearing data sounds.

On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Thomas L. Staley Jr. wrote:

> You should be able to monitor the P-25 stuff in conventional mode even
> if the control channel is 9600.
>
> Tom
>
> JERRY NONE wrote:
> >
> > Wel lthen I have NO reason to buy one then.  The only
> > current DIGITAL TRS in my area is Clevland Ohio's 3600
> > Baud VSLEP NON-RADIO SCANNABLE TRS.  I can see the
> > Talk Groups show up on the Control Frequency but what
> > good does it do me if I CANNOT listen in.
> > I think that the Ohio M.A.R.C.s T.R.S. is supposed to
> > be a 9600 Baud DIGITAL T.R.S., so I was gonna buy one
> > so that I could listen to this but now it DOESN'T make
> > sense to shell out $600.00 American for a paper
> > weight.
> > --- JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi everyone.  Well, I guess the news isiin that
> > > these new scanners are not
> > > going to do 9.6 K after all.  How many systems are
> > > there that are 9.6 K
> > > besides the state of Michigan's system?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TrunkCom mailing list
> > > mailto:[email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> > http://faith.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>