[TrunkCom] something else to consider with the BC-250D and 785D
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON
[email protected]
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:58:08 -0500 (EST)
Well, it is hard here. I've been trying to explain to people here that I
have listened tothe department I wanted to listen to since I was very very
young, and I hate to now have to bum radios off of people. I know that
this may be wishful thinking, but I hope that even the glitches tet
cleared out by Christmas, and this is the best way to go in terms of
asking for one. I'm just curious, but what glithces were in the 780?
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Harry Marnell wrote:
> I try to NEVER buy a scanner when it first comes out. Give them
> several months to works the bugs out. You'll survive.
>
> Harry Marnell
> http://www.snowcrest.net/marnells/kma367.htm <~~ LAPD Communications
> History
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 16:10
> Subject: [TrunkCom] something else to consider with the BC-250D and 785D
>
>
> > Hi everyone, as I was going through the thread on the list here about
> the
> > BC250D I thought of something. This is that probably with the release
> of
> > these newer scanners with digital cards as an option there will
> probably
> > be glitches that may come with early versions. I don't know what they
> > will be, but I'm wondering if anyone else has any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TrunkCom mailing list
> > mailto:[email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TrunkCom mailing list
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/trunkcom
>