[TheForge] Power hammer Vs air hammer
Grover Richardson
grover.richardson at gtri.gatech.edu
Wed May 24 08:23:41 EDT 2006
PSI is PSI<G>.
>*>-----Original Message-----
>*>From: theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>*>[mailto:theforge-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Demon Buddha
>*>Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 7:34 PM
>*>To: Sponsored by ABANA
>*>Subject: Re: [TheForge] Power hammer Vs air hammer
>*>
>*>
>*>
>*>
>*>Rich Maynard wrote:
>*>> My suspicion is that with a compressible fluid you would
>*>not be able
>*>> to rely on positioning like that unless you incorporated
>*>some kind of
>*>> feedback.
>*>
>*> Well, I'm not necessarily looking for precisely that
>*>sort of precision,
>*>but only something in the ballpark. Also, compressibility
>*>for a given
>*>mass (ram) is largely dependent on the volume of air. As the volume
>*>increases, the ram becomes "stiffer" in its motion.
>*>>
>*>> An optical sensor connected to a wee microcontroller ought
>*>to do it,
>*>> and a rotary sensor on the treadle.
>*>
>*> Oh sure, one could do it digitally, but I live in a
>*>digital world and
>*>am sick of it, to be honest. I'm looking for something a little
>*>older-fashioned and simple.
>*>>
>*>> Hammer-by-wire, anyone?
>*>>
>*>> Of course, such delicate electronics have no place in a
>*>smith's shop!
>*>
>*> There you go. :) _______________________________________________
>*>Manage membership or unsubscribe at:
>*>>*>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/theforge
>*>theforge
>*>mail list group photo site is http://www.photoaccess.com
>*>Login: blacksmithblacksmith at hotmail.com
>*>password: anvil
>*>___________
>*>
>*>
More information about the TheForge
mailing list