[TAC] Another question
Greg Surma
Greg.Surma at wnem.com
Fri Aug 5 15:55:28 EDT 2005
Good idea Jeff...yes...the closer the better for 20/15/10. Especially
given our rotor limitations.
-----Original Message-----
From: tac-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:tac-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of n8cc at mei.net
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 3:29 PM
To: TAC at mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [TAC] Another question
Regarding antenna placement on 20-15-10:
I wonder if a hunderd feet of proximity to the water, more or less,
is going to make any difference on the high bands with beam-type
antennas
anyway. I know it'll make a big difference with the verticals on the
low
bands, but you might want to think about just keeping the beams/quads
closer to the rooms.
Since it's likely that you'll be the only borders at that time of year
anyway, I doubt you'll get much static about antenna placement from
management. In fact, the only trouble we had in October was a couple
on horseback that wandered into the radials by accident, right out by
the water. No injuries to radials or beasts, but it was exciting for
a few seconds!
I guess I'd put the high band antennas up wherever you run out of coax.
You're still practically right on the water, when you step out the door.
Oh, are you doing armstrong antenna rotation? That'd be another reason
to keep 'em close!
73, Jeff
______________________________________________________________
TAC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tac
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmmain.htm
Post: mailto:TAC at mailman.qth.net
More information about the TAC
mailing list