[SOC] MCW, again.

[Bry Carling]

LOL

Best regards - Bry Carling, AF4K





On Oct 5, 2018, at 11:11 AM, g4jht <g4jht at eircom.net<mailto:g4jht at eircom.net>> wrote:

Hi Tom, Why not just ask the FOC op, if he _READY_  to receive traffic in  MCW "MODE" ?
this usually get a stunned silence. then repeat the question with Tx switched to MCW.
Normally gets you a clear channel/frequency.

73s, Dave and Pene  G4JHT/EI0DB/VP8ART

On 10/05/2018 02:07 PM, Tom Cooper via SOC wrote:
MCW (Modulated Continuous Wave Modulation)  is a perfect SOC term because it uses "modulation" so perfectly.  Just think, we could say things like "modulated by modulated continuous wave modulation"  whenever we like.

The next time I check the frequency for occupancy a couple of times ("QRL?  QRL?") and get no reply, then call CQ only to be called an ".- ... ..." by some FOC operator for using his personal frequency I'm going to ask if he would mind if I call CQ again a few times using a rig "modulated by modulated continuous wave modulation" and repeat the question just to make sure it is fully understood.

73,

Tom  W1EAT
______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


______________________________________________________________
SOC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html