[SOC] MCW, again.
g4jht
g4jht at eircom.net
Fri Oct 5 11:12:16 EDT 2018
Hi Tom, Why not just ask the FOC op, if he _READY_ to receive traffic
in MCW "MODE" ?
this usually get a stunned silence. then repeat the question with Tx
switched to MCW.
Normally gets you a clear channel/frequency.
73s, Dave and Pene G4JHT/EI0DB/VP8ART
On 10/05/2018 02:07 PM, Tom Cooper via SOC wrote:
> MCW (Modulated Continuous Wave Modulation) is a perfect SOC term because it uses "modulation" so perfectly. Just think, we could say things like "modulated by modulated continuous wave modulation" whenever we like.
>
> The next time I check the frequency for occupancy a couple of times ("QRL? QRL?") and get no reply, then call CQ only to be called an ".- ... ..." by some FOC operator for using his personal frequency I'm going to ask if he would mind if I call CQ again a few times using a rig "modulated by modulated continuous wave modulation" and repeat the question just to make sure it is fully understood.
>
> 73,
>
> Tom W1EAT
> ______________________________________________________________
> SOC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/soc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SOC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the SOC
mailing list