[Skywarn] Skywarn Digest, Vol 24, Issue 3

[OllySteed at aol.com]

Yes you are correct but it is *NOT* all of us.
That one letter I read was very abrasive and name calling so I was ready to 
 leave but someone took care of that for me and I was off the list.
Some of those OEM people may very well be members of many of these list and 
 then they read moron and get your shit together just does not help at all.
However we do have the right to be notified when and where the testing will 
 be.
This also may get a few more repeaters active.
So Monday I will contact the OEM office and show them papers I have
I have a stack of books here and on my own I have studied weather  
meteorology.
BOB
AF2Q   _www.angelfire.com/nj4/rescue/_ 
(http://www.angelfire.com/nj4/rescue/) 
 
 
 
In a message dated 8/6/2011 4:46:48 P.M. Atlantic Daylight Time,  
lanelson1 at juno.com writes:

This  whole exchange highlights another reason why the EM community may be 
reticent  in the use of hams. If we show a lack of professionalism here 
(which could be  read by anyone), do you think that EMs want to associated with  
that?