[SFDXA] Southeastern Division Survey Question on Technician DigitalSubbands

Kai k.siwiak at ieee.org
Thu Jun 26 17:21:03 EDT 2014


Pete
Unless you find that proposal entirely OK, I urge you to vote NO, and include a 
comment.
Voting YES endorses a very bad proposal.
The last thing we need is yet more band segmentation codified in the regs!

73
Kai, KE4PT


On 6/26/2014 5:08 PM, Pete Rimmel N8PR wrote:
> For all of you who voted NO, if there is a way to change that, I suggest you 
> do so.
>
> My thinking is as follows:
>
> If enough vote no, then NOTHING will happen.
>
> If we vote YES, then there is time for the plan to be refined before it is 
> submitted, which is what I am hoping will happen.
>
> I think, personally, that the incentive will get more Technician hams on HF 
> and then encourage them  to upgrade.
>
> TOO BAD that they did not give 3 choices:  Yes, No, Yes, in principle but 
> needs refining.
>
> 73,  PeteR  N8PR
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> South Florida DX Assoc. "SINCE 1974"
> "OUR 40th ANNIVERSARY!"
> SFDXA WebSite: http://www.SFDXA.com
> SFDXA Repeater 147.33+ 103.5 Tone
> To Post: mailto:SFDXA at mailman.qth.net
> To UNSUBSCRIBE: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sfdxa
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>



More information about the SFDXA mailing list