[Scan-DC] Breaking News Network (UNCLASSIFIED)

D.R. Watkins drwatkins3 at rcn.com
Fri Feb 29 06:15:32 EST 2008


So can't the message sent here be considered a prime example of "Bad
reporting"???

Dewey 

-----Original Message-----
From: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of cohenner at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 21:30
To: Grabill, Jason Mr USAG; scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net;
Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] Breaking News Network (UNCLASSIFIED)

Firstly, I need to apologize for my post before. I had no intention of
insulting anyone.

1st Responder has the same deal. A junior dispatcher cannot send something
directly to the system - and a senior dispatcher must proof it before it
goes out. 

David
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

{SNIP}

-----Original Message-----
From: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of cohenner at gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Sean Hoyden; Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] Breaking News Network

I am a member on 1st Responderwireless News. BNN is notorious for
reporting bad news. I would stick with 1st Responder.

David
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


More information about the Scan-DC mailing list