[Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments

[Doug K.]

Ed and all,

Ref the Montgomery Fire radios, the way I understand this, it affects only 
the radios in the fire apparatus, correct?  IE, no talkgroups are being 
changed or reassigned or whatever, so this migration won't affect those of 
us with digital trunking scanners - is that right?

Thanks!

Regards,

Doug


>From: "Ed Tobias" <edtobias at comcast.net>
>To: "Randy Benn" <randybenn at gmail.com>,"John Antonelli" 
><Johnantonelli at verizon.net>,"David Schoenberger" 
><davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>CC: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:29:21 -0400
>
>More on this.....
>
>Yesterday I sent an e-mail concerning Montgomery County Fire Rescue and I 
>was using an old list of channels and talk-groups for my info.  I 
>mentioned, however, that some changes were in the works to allow units to 
>use mobile repeaters, to be installed in the Battalion Chief buggies.  I've 
>now learned that this will result in changing of the way a number of zones 
>are named. Zone 8, for example, will become Zone 71.  Zone 9 will become 
>Zone 72.  Zone 10 will become Zone 79.
>
>So, for example, a unit being told to switch to the EMRC "calling" TG will 
>be told to switch to 72-C, rather than 9-C. I think the mobile repeaters 
>will be operating on 7-N, 71-N and 72-N.  There will be many other changes.
>
>I believe the changeover is supposed to be completed by November.
>
>Stay tuned,
>
>
>Ed
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Benn" <randybenn at gmail.com>
>To: "John Antonelli" <Johnantonelli at verizon.net>; "David Schoenberger" 
><davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>Cc: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:44 PM
>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>
>
>>I filled some of the holes on my original list, based on responses I 
>>received so far:
>>
>>0: DC
>>1: Arlington
>>2: Alexandria
>>3: MWAA
>>4: Fairfax
>>5: Prince William
>>6: Loudoun
>>7: Montgomery
>>8: Stafford
>>9: Hosp Patches?
>>10:
>>11: Faquier
>>12: Culpeper
>>
>>
>>Randy
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Antonelli" 
>><Johnantonelli at verizon.net>
>>To: "David Schoenberger" <davidschoenberger at gmail.com>
>>Cc: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:04 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] COG Radio Assignments
>>
>>
>>>Dc is 0 stafford is 8
>>>
>>>David Schoenberger wrote:
>>>>Randy,
>>>>
>>>>I don't know about 8, 9, and 10, but 12 is Culpeper.  DC may be
>>>>considered 0, though I'm not positive about that.  (Their primary
>>>>channels start with 0.)
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>On 7/16/06, Randy Benn <randybenn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Can anyone help me fill in the blanks on these channel assignments from 
>>>>>Metro Washington Council Of Governments?  I put together the list below 
>>>>>from RadioReference.com.  I couldn't seem to find anything on the MWCOG 
>>>>>web site.
>>>>>
>>>>>  1: Arlington
>>>>>  2: Alexandria
>>>>>  3: MWAA
>>>>>  4: Fairfax
>>>>>  5: Prince William
>>>>>  6: Loudoun
>>>>>  7: Montgomery
>>>>>  8:
>>>>>  9:
>>>>>  10:
>>>>>  11: Faquier
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>Randy
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Scan-DC mailing list
>>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scan-DC mailing list
>Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc