[QCWA] Re: Chapter 10, Walt Maxwell motion

[Norm Gertz]

Carolyn.....please pass on Walt Maxwell's motion for our information.

Also...." Usually Gaylen Pearson, Vic Culver and Jim Lewis prefer to not be
>>included in the day-by-day committee work."

If the above cannot participate with the committee then they should be 
replaced by others who have the time to do so.

73   Norm   K1AA



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carolyn Harrison" <carolynwb0oum at alltel.net>
To: "Larry McCalvy" <wa9jmo at wi.net>; <broske at hutchtel.net>
Cc: <qcwa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:32 PM
Subject: [QCWA] Re: Chapter 10, Walt Maxwell motion


> Hi Larry and Bob,
>
> You will notice according to  the Organizational Structure chart how large 
> this CR committee is. Only the Committee Members have a vote the way this 
> was set up which you probably don't know, Larry, because you became a 
> member after Blanche Randles resigned as Director. Gaylen and Jim are in 
> positions where they wanted limited participation in the daily committee 
> business. Gaylen gave us the top hamfest list where we should have QCWA 
> representation if possible. Jim, Convention Chair 2007, was included 
> initially but said to not include him in the emails anymore. Vic is on the 
> list because of being the 2008 Convention Chair. He sends a update 
> quarterly and I receive his weekly chapter newsletter.
>
> I agree with the time frames you are indicating and the vote count will be 
> the usual method. The Chapter 10 problem email discussion at this point in 
> time has been limited to Chuck, Ken, you two and myself. We need the full 
> committee involvement before we move ahead which is appropriate if we are 
> should be sending a letter from the CR Committee to Chapter 10 and Walt 
> Maxwell.
>
> 73,
>
> Carolyn
>
>
>
> At 10:07 AM 1/9/2008 -0600, Larry McCalvy wrote:
>>Hi Carolyn and Bob,
>>
>>With the motion and second, there is normally a discussion period of 5 to 
>>7 days when working by email. Then 2 to 4 days for the vote. If we get 
>>more Ayes than Nays it passes.
>>
>>In my opinion if Gaylen Pearson, Vic Culver and Jim Lewis are on the 
>>committee, they should participate in all its activities - otherwise why 
>>have them.
>>
>>73,
>>
>>Larry
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Carolyn Harrison" 
>><carolynwb0oum at alltel.net>
>>To: <broske at hutchtel.net>; <wa9jmo at wi.net>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:29 PM
>>Subject: Chapter 10, Walt Maxwell motion
>>
>>
>>>Hi Bob and Larry,
>>>
>>>Help me get over my confused state! After submitting your motion and 
>>>second to the entire CR Committee, then I will call for discussion. 
>>>Usually Gaylen Pearson, Vic Culver and Jim Lewis prefer to not be 
>>>included in the day-by-day committee work.
>>>
>>>Thanks guys!
>>>73,
>>>Carolyn WB0OUM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 
>>>269.17.13/1214 - Release Date: 1/8/2008 1:38 PM
>>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net
>