[PaQSO] Puzzling
J. P. Fox, III
jpfox at enter.net
Thu Oct 15 20:58:20 EDT 2015
Mike,
Blair said it all.
73,
JP N3GWR, 33k from Berks County. :-)
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:08 PM, K3YD via PaQSO <paqso at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm baffled too. PAQP was the first contest in which I participated. (I won't say how many thousand year ago.) I've watched the rules change a bit over the years (remember 1.5 points for CW Q's?) while the contest grew to be "Something Big".
>
> This is a contest where a guy with 100 watts and a decent dipole, in a rare county, can feel like real rare DX. This is a contest where I can say "Hello" to old friends who I hear year-after-year but probably wouldn't recognize if I encountered them in a Mall.
>
> It's a fun contest because I can operate from home, or go to a rare county and either way I can get some sleep overnight. The 2-day format is wonderful because I can't always get on for both days. I remember one year when I showed up for the first time about 1600 EDST Sunday and enjoyed a bottomless 2-hour run. :-)
>
> I keep trying for a sweep of PA counties (never got more than 66), and wonder if anyone will every get a Super-sweep (all counties plus all ARRL/CRRL mults).
>
> Thanks Mike (and before you, Doug) for all your hard work of organizing and managing. Thanks NARC for sponsoring the best weekend activity in Ham radio. And it isn't broken . . . don't fix it!
>
> 73, Blair K3YD
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Coslo <mjcn3li at gmail.com>
> To: paqso <paqso at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wed, Oct 14, 2015 10:20 pm
> Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Puzzling
>
>
> I’m also baffled.
>
> If I might note, it gets a little discouraging to come home,
> and most of what I hear is all the things I’m doing wrong. Both via the list and
> privately.
>
> I always suggest that people who love contesting should try
> administering one. This is my tenth administration of the QSO Party. I am
> amazed.
>
> As you note - the party is not broken. It does not need fixed. The
> original complaint that started this was an out of state Op who didn’t hear many
> mobiles. As noted, propagation was not terribly good. We have mobiles, we have
> activity.
>
> I am going to take a few days off from the list now, to quiet my
> ragged nerves. Carry on.
>
> Mike
>
>
>>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Herb Krumich via
>> PaQSO <paqso at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>>
>> I am baffled why hams try fixing
> things that aren't broke. This is a beautiful contest and the results every year
> confirm this.
>> So what i
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list