[PaQSO] Lies, darn lies, and statistics
Goody K3NG
goody.k3ng at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 19:25:55 EST 2007
For giggles I threw the top ten scores from 2006 of the QRP, medium
power single op, and QRO single op categories into Excel and calculated
averages:
QRP: 94,682 (includes QRP Bonus Multiplier)
Medium Power: 143,933
QRO: 156,313
Ratios:
QRP:Medium:QRO = 1:1.52:1.65
Medium:QRO = 1:1.086
I chose the top ten scores as to select only top scoring operators and
presumably only those who operated seriously for the entire event, and
admittedly it was the most convenient way to do it.
It would be nice to see other years calculated and I'll admit this isn't
100% scientific, but there are some interesting observations to take
away. Mainly, there wasn't much of an advantage to running QRO over
medium power and the QRP Bonus Multiplier on average didn't give QRP a
leg up on Medium Power or QRO.
While the averages don't show a QRP advantage, the top QRP score would
have placed second in the QRO category (statewide) and second in the
Medium Power category (statewide). I think there's a perception that
the QRP bonus provides an advantage based on single instances like this,
but the averages don't show an overall advantage.
Again, this isn't 100% scientific. Ideas on other ways to slice and
dice the numbers are welcome.
73
Goody
K3NG
--
Blog: http://thek3ngreport.blogspot.com/
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list