[PaQSO] QRP
STATELOT5 at aol.com
STATELOT5 at aol.com
Wed Oct 31 19:26:05 EST 2007
My opinion: The QRP multiplier is unfair and unnecessary. HOWEVER, if it
stays I am willing to run QRP and take advantage of it. Maybe my opinion will
be different then.
All categories should be available to all 3 power levels. Each power level
competes with its own. A good QRP effort is obvious, without giving it a
nebulous 2x multiplier. Multi-Multi QRP should be a category.
I also think that there should be a phone-only category. That could
eliminate the need for a cw mult at all. I like being able to go to cw and work the
same stations as on phone so I will always prefer the "mixed" category. But a
phone-only category would surely suit the newcomers who aren't brought into
ham radio with cw like a lot of us were.
Yes, the categories must stop somewhere! I'm not advocating a bunch of
obscure categories. And NO, I dont think that QRP M/M is obscure! QRP should
always be encouraged especially in an event that promotes portable operation. I
think a serious QRP M/M sounds like a lot of fun! Encouraging QRP is what
initiated the 2x mult in the first place!
The PA QSO Party is a great event and I will enjoy it no matter what the
rules as long as I still get that 8 hours of off-time!!
Re: K8MR's query. I sure wouldn't miss that last hour.
73, Steve WA3A
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list