[PaQSO] Ten Meter Frequencies

Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:13:05 -0400

I could not agree more!  Let's really hit the upper bands and hit'em hard.
Let's make the left coast think we just discovered them!

Bob, N3FR

"When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his
sleep.  Not screaming like all the passengers in his car."  Will Rodgers.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Ten Meter Frequencies

My comments on this 10 meter thread are:

SOME WHERE

ANYWHERE

I DON'T CARE WHERE

PLEASE, JUST GO THERE

And remember to peek in on 20 and 15 meters on your way up

I know.....I know.......many of you are saying I'm like an old broken
record (wax, or vynyl.......remember those things??) on this topic. But I
just can't resist the opportunity to make my annual appeal to increase the
activity "UP THERE".  If we could get about 100 PA-er's calling CQ on 10
meters, all at the same time, I'm guessing 10 meters (or 15 or 20) might
just "open up" like a faucet.

In reality I realize I'm pretty much preaching to the choir here. Need to
get the word to the more casual participants within Pa. So spread the word.
If half the guys on this reflector  would each get one participant to
follow the 10/15/20 suggested freq/time schedule, we should generate some
rasonable activity. Just take a listen the weekend before, to the activity
on 10/15/20 for the CQP. While the two contests are very different, we
should be able to generate 10 or 20 or 30% of that activity for our event.

Ok...(maybe) that's it for this year from me on this topic.

Ed/WA3SES

                    [email protected]

                    m                       To:     [email protected],
[email protected]                            
                    Sent by:                cc:

                    paqso-admin@mailm       Subject:     Re: [PaQSO] Ten
Meter Frequencies                            
                    an.qth.net

                    09/04/2002 05:24

                    PM

In a message dated 09/04/2002 16:52:54 Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected]
writes:

<< Given the xxx80 suggested SSB frequencies used on all the other bands,
28480
 would make a lot more sense. >>

You've got my vote, but it's the decision of the NARC contest committee
which
really matters.

k3yd
_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso

_______________________________________________
PaQSO mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---