[NLRS] AOL update
Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
geraldj at netins.net
Fri Jun 13 14:26:21 EDT 2014
Last month my main ISP switched spam filters to RedCondor. I have the
user options for incoming filter turned to no filtering depending on
Thurderbird to filter spam without filtering things I want. And after
years of training its doing well. But when the ISP went to RedCondor
they left aggressive filtering set for outgoing mails and I was getting
several quarantined but I was able to get them released. I complained
because the apparent filters were based on certain individual words more
than once in the text or more than 2 links. But the quarantine message
they sent to me had more than two links. I complained that was
discrimination, why could their quarantine send what I wasn't allowed to
send? I was able to reapply my other ISP making it look like my newest
ISP so I didn't have to resubscribe to multiple mailing lists. I have
accidentally sent a few responses lately and the outgoing filter seems
to be more tolerant now. In my complaint I pointed out that links were a
part of technical correspondence and critical to work products at times.
Point is an extreme spam filter setting will not accept more than one
link and the typical original post gets out of a qth.net mailer with at
least two links, this one has four. When included in a reply there can
be four links per copied post plus the reply. Plus any the writer's
include to make a point or supply an information link. Extreme spam
filters also look for a string of to addresses such as can come from a
mailer and figure its spam if it has more than two addressees. A
characteristic of mailing lists that spam filters try to not allow.
Often all the addressee or subscriber will notice is low activity while
his local spam filter is rejecting posts causing the mailing list to do
the unsubscribe bit.
I have taken to trimming replies (but won't this one) to get rid of the
trailing links and trimming links to take of the http:// prefix. Its a
sign of really dumb filter design that catches http://www..... but not
www......com I allege those setting up filters based on text content are
incompetent because from past experience they catch text, but don't run
HTML to check the display, only check the HTML code but a fundamental in
HTML is the ability to independently address screen locations and insert
characters entirely out of order to what is seen on the screen. If
that's not filtered, the filter is failing. If the filter picks certain
words without looking at their context its also incompetent.
There may be an alternative to mailing lists and spam filters. I
participate in a couple agricultural forums where a subscription is
required to post, but anybody can read and where topics are threaded.
One is www.allischalmers.com where the threads are displayed with the
most recent first and talk.newagtalk/forums where there are several
general forums and a very large group of participants. These do take
active moderators because there are spammers joining and posting nearly
every day with advertisements for off shore made products that don't
pertain to the agricultural topics. I think commercial software is
available to run such a forum, maybe even from qth.net. Both these
forums have mechanisms for participants to notify the administrators of
inappropriate threads.
qth.com offers mail addresses and web page space for a small cost per
month or year, with a custom url also relatively cheaply. There the mail
server should be list friendly. But I'm sure at a higher cost than AOL,
GMAIL, or hotmail.
73, Jerry, K0CQ
On 6/13/2014 11:01 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Apparently the recent bounces and unsubs to/from our AOL subscribers
> wasn't a part of the DMARC deal. They just plain blocked the traffic for
> some unknown reason. All the AOL subscribers have been resubbed via
> either "time out" or via their own action.
>
> If it happens again, I'll forward a few specific cases to our helpers at
> QSL.net.
>
> I'll stay after it.
> 73
> Bruce Richardson W9FZ
>
>
> See you at the 48th Central States VHF Society Conference, July 25-26,
> in Austin, TX Just go to http://www.csvhfs.org
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> NLRS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/nlrs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NLRS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
More information about the NLRS
mailing list