[MRCA] Configuring solid-state subs for HV Rectifiers

[B. Smith]

The mercury vapor tubes look better and are more forgiving.
Z

http://k4che.com/866/866TESTJigpage1.htm

On 9/11/2023 7:21 AM, Doran Platt wrote:
> This question may be rhetorical in nature and I should have put it to 
> rest a long time ago. Nonetheless,
> when directly substituting mercury vapor rectifiers with plug-in SS 
> substitutes like the STBR3B28, et al, is it necessary or /desirable/ 
> to ensure that the HV take off is not wired to the original filament 
> pin that would require the HV to pass /back through/ the HV 
> transformer filament winding?  I know the winding has insulation for 
> the HV and not the issue.
> Fact is, I've always simply plugged them in and they work.  Much about 
> nothing?  TNX
> Jeep K3HVG
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20230911/8dcd8639/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: k4chegrin.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 172 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20230911/8dcd8639/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: k4chekeyer.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 230770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20230911/8dcd8639/attachment-0003.gif>