[Milsurplus] Opinions on comm receivers

Jim Whartenby old_radio at aol.com
Mon Jun 2 17:28:40 EDT 2025


Perhaps, but one has to have some skill beyond flicking a switch from AM to sideband.  Then there is the wait for the oscillators to settle down, adjusting the BFO and riding the RF gain control.  Too complicated for some, I guess.
How much better would AM be if the same attention to detail was given to AM reception as was given to SSB?  John P. Costas was right.Jim
Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.  Murphy 

    On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 04:09:54 PM CDT, B. Smith via Milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> wrote:   

  
 A lot of hams are not interested in some of the older receivers because of the lack of SSB suppressed-carrier reception.  What falderal. Just turn on the BFO, turn off the AVC and use the RF gain.
 K4CHE
 
 ______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20250602/5ccb6e3b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: semk4che.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 9511 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20250602/5ccb6e3b/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list