[Milsurplus] FW: Prosser Electronics Sale

Paul Thekan pfthekan at gmail.com
Tue Aug 8 23:30:05 EDT 2023


I like the older black crackle HROs..as well as the post war HROs that are
black crackle.  I like my HRO 7C and a HRO 50R-1 that like Hues has a dead
pwr xfmr.
I got the front panel of a Coast Guard R-460  and it's S meter and PW
dial.  It's a painted a nice gray. I'm hoping to find a cosmetically
challenged HRO 50T or 50T1, that had the added IF stage, that I can maybe
repurpose it into a R-460
I'm guessing the R-460 is probably a 50 R1 in uniform.

Paul
N6FEG


On Tue, Aug 8, 2023, 4:29 PM Hubert Miller <Kargo_cult at msn.com> wrote:

> I agree that the HRO-7 is butt ugly but i think it would have been even
> uglier in black wrinkle. It's just ugly.
> The HROs i prefer are light colored, like grey. Apparently from the Nat'l
> catalog grey was available in the
> HRO, at least ones before the -5 ? I owned an AMR-101, which i kinda
> regret selling, and i liked very much
> the grey finish. I have a ( German ) KST and i tell you, it looks much
> better than black, plus the knobs are
> more stylish. ( Would you expect otherwise from a European product ? )  I
> have a Japanese HRO also, and
> that one has a nice Japanese army light green. ( I understand mine might
> be a "Model 65", different from
> the grey "Chi-Ichi" "Ground-Air Receiver No.1" .  ( I don't know why the
> Japanese "HRO" is so uncommon
> here. I suppose they were not produced in any numbers, as the standard
> receiver for ship and ground
> stations both was that huge beast, "Special Receiver 92". And if you
> Google it, the only pix you see is NOT
> the receiver. )
> At Puyallup i bought a National HFS just to get the power supply. I
> offered to buy the power supply alone
> for his price, but he said i had to take it all. That PS i think i will
> match up with the HRO-5TA1 i have, which
> i am going to sell. I bought separately off Ebay the HRO ham bandspread
> coils to go with it.
> I have a nice looking HRO-50 in the Coast Guard R-460 nameplate now. It
> lacks the power transformer
> ( I think in common with all vintage Nationals ) and i have only the 7 -
> 14 Mcs. coil. Looks "real military"
> but somehow i don't think i should go down that diversion path.
> -Hue Miller
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20230808/2f65a296/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list