[Milsurplus] GRA-53 / GRA-54
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
COURYHOUSE at aol.com
Thu Sep 1 14:11:32 EDT 2016
we put a vrc version in the wing commanders car at Luke AFB ! ca. 1970s
early...
Ed Sharpe archivist for smecc
In a message dated 9/1/2016 8:54:27 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ka2ivy at verizon.net writes:
I worked on the GRA-53 in the US Air Force in 1970-71. Because of the
markings and manual, I knew there was a mobile version as well, but did not see
one until I got one of my own years later. The main repair problems were
caused by the tantalum condensors in the transceiver shorting out, usually
causing an obvious or total failure and easy to find and repair. They ran
HOT, and in southeast Asia that was exascerbated by the climate. In an air
conditioned room it was managable. The worst problem with them and their
cousins the ARC and GRC-27 was getting them to work to book and inspection
specifications. They would easily produce 90% of output power and break
squelch at 3.2 microvolts day in day out for months, but getting them to 100% of
output and under 3 microvolts sensitivity was for all practical purposes
impossible. Massive tube replacements and re-alignment (DAYS of tweaking,
praying, and sometimes cursing) would get them to produce 100.5% of rated
power and break squelch at 2.999 microvolts for a day or so, pass inspection,
and quell the lifers. They WILL work on the 220 Mc band if the trimmers on
the wideband tuners are tweaked. It is also possible to use them as a
transverter for AM or FM. I have tried to entice some locals to get something
going on the 220 band, but no one seems to care around here. I KNOW! it's
really 222-225, but like to say 220 to let "them" know the loss of the 2
megs is remembered, the new uses are a failure, and they should be
returned.
Bruce Gentry, KA2IVY
On 9/1/16 11:05 AM, antqradio at sbcglobal.net wrote:
The above are similar to the VRC-24, TRC-68 and URC-9 UHF multi-channel
transceivers of the late 1950's and early 1960's. The VRC-24 and the TRC-68
share a common manual but the URC-9 is in a class of it's own although it
is the same RT unit with a slightly different die-cast front panel, is in
grey instead of OD and of course, Navy.
I am curious about the heritage of the design. If one goes by RT
numbers, then it seems that the sequence is:
VRC-24 with RT-323
TRC-68 with RT-441
URC-9 with RT-581
But I have no idea where the GRA-53 and GRA-54 fit into the lineage. When
I was in the Air Force and stationed at Mactan, AB, Philippians in the
late 1960's, I worked on TRC-68's, GRA-53's and GRA-54's. Long after I was
discharged I learned about the VRC-24 and URC-9 versions.
If anyone is lucky enough to have examples of the GRA's in their
collection, could you please send photos of the nomenclature tags on the RT unit,
power supply and case? Stories about working on these beasts are also
welcome. Anyone have the extension cable that allows operation of the RT unit
outside of the case?
Thanks in advance,
Jim
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: _http://www.qsl.net_ (http://www.qsl.net/)
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20160901/97841322/attachment.html>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list