[Milsurplus] ART-13

[Lloyd KK7IZ]

They did this to confuse the enemy. We have met the enemy and they is us.
Thanx
Lloyd  KK7IZ
kk7iz at cox.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <WA5CAB at cs.com>
To: <rickb at tx.rr.com>; <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] ART-13


> Yes.  The "fine print" (not always accurately followed) in the 
> nomenclature
> system says to do it this way, rather than T-47A/ART-13A.  But if the 
> component
> number is changed, it's done the other way, as in T-412/ART-13B.  As 
> another
> example, SG-85C/URM-25D is a component of AN/URM-25J.  You would have to 
> look
> at a progression of all of the AN/URM-25 family in order to understand how 
> it
> came about.
>
> In a message dated 3/3/2009 4:40:35 PM Central Standard Time, 
> rickb at tx.rr.com
> writes:
>> Is T-47A/ART-13 a legitimate nomenclature?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick/k5iar
>>
>
> Robert Downs - Houston
> wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
> MVPA 9480
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>