[Milsurplus] Re: [ARC5] Re: Collings Foundation
Mike Morrow
kk5f at earthlink.net
Mon May 21 12:46:54 EDT 2007
Roy wrote:
>...I could only guess
>what it would take to keep a suite of the ARC-5's, the BC-375 and BC-348
>running. Shipping a spare BC-348 across the country to replace a dead on
>on the aircraft would likely not be cost effective.
Plus there aren't any facilities using HF AM anymore.
Do they actually use AN/ARC-5 units (very incorrect for USAAF...those were USN sets)? I've actually seen some USAAF bomber "restorations" that did have AN/ARC-5 transmitters in place of where SCR-274-N units should have been. Someone really dropped the ball there!
How about the most widely used command set of the ETO, the VHF-AM SCR-522? I don't think I've ever seen any of these bomber restorations that restored that.
It would also be nice to see the RC-103 and AN/ARN-5 ILS gear, and the SCR-269 ADF, the RC-93 marker beacon, and the SCR-595 IFF stuff installed. This stuff is still pretty easy to obtain, but it won't be forever.
Mike / KK5F
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list