[Milsurplus] ARR-41

jcoward5452 at aol.com jcoward5452 at aol.com
Mon Sep 11 22:29:10 EDT 2006


Could have been some techie type,(like us!) with time and parts on hand 
and just wanted a shop radio.If I were in that position I certainly 
would have done so and probably gotten permission or even unofficial 
orders from the chief!
 Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: kk5f at earthlink.net
To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] ARR-41

>Lots of radios and radars go thru modifications and
>do not get any sort of nomenclature change.

That's generally true if the modified unit could still serve in all the 
same
installations that it had served in prior to modification.  An 
AC-powered R-648
could not be.  Unless the power connector was phyically altered to a 
different
type as part of the modification, this franken-R-648 could easily be 
installed
by error in places where the normal R-648 should have been.  That's to 
be
discouraged in the US military services!  It takes work to make stuff
sailor-proof.

There would have to be some sort of official documentation of the 
modification
in the system literature, and at the very least some obvious visible 
indication
of the modification present on the unit to keep it away from places it 
couldn't
go anymore.

Mike / KK5F
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net

________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and 
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from 
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list