[Milsurplus] Freon vs CO2
WA5CAB at cs.com
WA5CAB at cs.com
Wed May 4 16:20:41 EDT 2005
You're correct on both counts. But the groups who caused the Freon variant
refrigerants to be outlawed are also the ones pushing the global warming scare.
The increased release of CO2 and etc. caused by use of much less efficient
refrigerants will, if you believe them, exacerbate global warming. Of course
any reference to the fact that the planet is coming out of a little ice age or
that the mean temperature has been higher that today's in relatively recent
history are carefully screened out of all reports.
The reason for my comment earlier about the refrigerant scare being BS was
that Freon is heavier than air. When released, it goes down, not up. Unless
you have something with enough force to loft a bunch of it, like a volcanic
eruption or a thermonuclear explosion. And it wouldn't survive the nuke anyway.
In a message dated 5/4/2005 2:35:36 PM Central Daylight Time, sdaitch at ibb.gov
writes:
> I thought the real problem with freon was that it affected the ozone layer,
> while
> greenhouse gases were the effect of higher carbon dioxide level, two
> differenet
> animals.
>
> 73
> Sheldon
> WA4MZZ
>
> "J. Forster" wrote:
>
> >Gordon White wrote:
> >
> >> Incidentally, have you seen that the HCH's that replaced Freon are now
> an
> >>environmental no-no? Worse than Freon.
Robert Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
<wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
<wa5cab at houston.rr.com> (Backup email)
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list