[MilCom] Broadband Comms Monitoring for Presidential Security?

[Greg Brazil]

We did the same as Bill states in Navy EP3's, EA3's, EC121's, A1Q's, 
P2V's (special) etc.  No more to say.
Greg (SF Bay Area)

Bill "Superspy" Boltinghouse wrote:

> During my days in the USAF, our mission was to monitor all communications of
> the enemy and other governments
> 
> There are ground stations in other countries which can monitor comms as well
> as airborne platforms
> 
> We worked in conjuntion with the NSA/CSS
> 
> You might wish to check out www.fas.org and search on sigint, comint etc
> 
> Now that terrorism has come to the CONUS, I am certain that there are teams
> which are monitoring all types of civil communications searching for enemy
> communications
> 
> I cannot be more specific without possibly giving away monitoring techniques
> 
> Let me make a suggestion, if you are not too busy monitoring our
> communications (MILCOM); monitor those comms mentioned below and report any
> comms that sound out of sort to the FBI
> 
> Bill Boltinghouse
> 208 South 1st Street Apt 4A
> Council Bluffs Iowa 51503
> http://billboltinghouse.tripod.com/bill-webs/
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ken" <rfinder1 at verizon.net>
> To: "MILCOM" <milcom at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:10 PM
> Subject: [MilCom] Broadband Comms Monitoring for Presidential Security?
> 
> 
> 
>>Apparently Steve Douglass, 'Popular Communications', monthly columnist,
> 
> has
> 
>>got a  feature article (3 pages) "A Close Encounter of the Dubya Kind" in
>>the July 2004 edition which seems to indicate that he believes that when
> 
> the
> 
>>president is in an area, that there's an airborne aircraft flying above
> 
> that
> 
>>is monitoring a very wide range of frequencies being used on the ground
> 
> and
> 
>>if any radio comms (e.g. GMRS) are taken out of context to be a threat to
>>the President than a team is dispatched to track it down....
>>
>>Personally, I don't think terrorists are using FRS, GMRS, MURS, or Amateur
>>radios for their communications needs in the United States but it's more
>>probable that they may be using some of those prepaid digitial cellular
>>phones, which would be much more versatile than short range comms....  BUT
>>my theory could be wrong.. perhaps we all need to be placing our scanners
> 
> in
> 
>>the search mode to see what we might hear!!!???
>>
>>So does anyone have an opinion on these theories???
>>
>>Ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>MilCom mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milcom
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>>Post: mailto:MilCom at mailman.qth.net
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> MilCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:MilCom at mailman.qth.net
>