[MilCom] Broadband Comms Monitoring for Presidential Security?
Bill "Superspy" Boltinghouse
elint_sigint_comint at cox.net
Wed Jul 14 03:41:47 EDT 2004
During my days in the USAF, our mission was to monitor all communications of
the enemy and other governments
There are ground stations in other countries which can monitor comms as well
as airborne platforms
We worked in conjuntion with the NSA/CSS
You might wish to check out www.fas.org and search on sigint, comint etc
Now that terrorism has come to the CONUS, I am certain that there are teams
which are monitoring all types of civil communications searching for enemy
communications
I cannot be more specific without possibly giving away monitoring techniques
Let me make a suggestion, if you are not too busy monitoring our
communications (MILCOM); monitor those comms mentioned below and report any
comms that sound out of sort to the FBI
Bill Boltinghouse
208 South 1st Street Apt 4A
Council Bluffs Iowa 51503
http://billboltinghouse.tripod.com/bill-webs/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken" <rfinder1 at verizon.net>
To: "MILCOM" <milcom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: [MilCom] Broadband Comms Monitoring for Presidential Security?
> Apparently Steve Douglass, 'Popular Communications', monthly columnist,
has
> got a feature article (3 pages) "A Close Encounter of the Dubya Kind" in
> the July 2004 edition which seems to indicate that he believes that when
the
> president is in an area, that there's an airborne aircraft flying above
that
> is monitoring a very wide range of frequencies being used on the ground
and
> if any radio comms (e.g. GMRS) are taken out of context to be a threat to
> the President than a team is dispatched to track it down....
>
> Personally, I don't think terrorists are using FRS, GMRS, MURS, or Amateur
> radios for their communications needs in the United States but it's more
> probable that they may be using some of those prepaid digitial cellular
> phones, which would be much more versatile than short range comms.... BUT
> my theory could be wrong.. perhaps we all need to be placing our scanners
in
> the search mode to see what we might hear!!!???
>
> So does anyone have an opinion on these theories???
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MilCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:MilCom at mailman.qth.net
More information about the MilCom
mailing list