AW: [Meteor-Scatter] MS Procedures

DF2ZC [email protected]
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:07:35 -0000


My final remark, Sebastian:  From that perspective those who like me in the
"300 or 500 lpm times" often needed two or three 2 hours skeds to complete a
MS QSO (which today is possible in FSK441 in 10 minutes) wouldn't be happy
either to see that with 3000 LPM the same would be done in perhaps half an
hour.

Well, that's the technical evolution we can't (and hopefully don't want to)
stop.

And most if not all people do value the greater effort that had to be put in
collecting the squares before WSJT was available.

For good or bad: it's a great hobby!!!

73s

Bernd
Happy to make MS-QSOs in any mode FSK441/HSCW/SSB/FM/AM

---------------------------
DF2ZC (JO30RN) www.df2zc.de
---------------------------
144 MHz WAC

Kenwood TS 2000
2 x GU74b by LZ2US www.qsl.net/lz2us
4 x 2M18XXX full elevation
MGF 1302 in masthead www.shf-elektronik.de
JUDSP dsp filter www.qsl.net/dk6ju/d_handbuch/manual0.html
Spectrum Lab FFT signal detection by DL4YHF www.qsl.net/dl4yhf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DG5CST, Sebastian [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2004 17:28
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: AW: [Meteor-Scatter] MS Procedures
>
>
> Hello Bernd,
> you are totaly right but I'm a newcomer ( out of your point of view) to
> meteorscatter.
> I hardly tryed to become used to HSCW with the help of MSDSP, and
> know it is
> useless.
> I've to ride another wave yet by trying to setup WSJT and modify
> my station.
> But what about those guys out of the "old clan" who had to spent much more
> time to climb
> in the toplist? I think they aren't realy happy about those one's who are
> nearly at the same level
> like them, without any HSCW usage.
> It's a damn hard question. But at all it's just a hobby anyone
> has to decide
> for him self what to do or
> not.
> So let's see what future brings next.
>
> 73 Sebastian