[Lowfer] Re: 600MRG> Experimental License Renewal
John Andrews
w1tag at w1tag.com
Mon Mar 3 11:26:16 EST 2008
>k2ors at comcast.net wrote:
> Just to clarify a point. It's my understanding that 'Renewal' implies renewing an existing licenses with no changes.
> If one attempts to modify a license at the time it expires, I believe that is not considered a 'Renewal' in FCC parlance.
> Modification generally takes as long as a new application (as Laurence found out when he modified WD2XDW!) Renewals are usually routine and faster.
Yes, I was only talking about renewals using Form 405. That form does
allow you to modify emission types and transmitter models, though. But
if you file modifications on Form 442, and the license term is going to
run out in the interim, you would be well advised to spend the bucks and
file a straight renewal. As you point out, that will be granted more
quickly, and your continued operation in the interim is covered by the
rule I mentioned earlier.
A truly cynical person would say that the FCC seems to move faster when
they hear the appropriate number of "ka-chings" for the task at hand. If
you attempt to save the filing fees, then expect neither speed nor
sympathy. But you'd have to be really cynical to believe that. <g>
John A.
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list