[Lowfer] Class E vs...
Peter Barick
pbarick at wpo.cso.niu.edu
Mon Feb 4 15:49:54 EST 2008
All, and esp. Warren,
Warren opines:
>>
Mike Dennison G3XDV points out in his Book "LF Today - A Guide to Success at 136kHz"
that given the low antenna efficiencies and high noise levels at LF don't bother with a transmitter that
puts out less than 100 Watts as its a waste of time.
There have always been (and will always be) dyed in the wool Piss-Weakers out there,
and as Bill pointed out Lyle, Bill A., B, C, & others have all given it a go and have now moved on.
<<
Hmm...lacking any obvious sign of humor, one can literally read Warren's comments as, well, most harsh!
I'd then ask, WHY? Why does hecontinue on in a belittling fashion?
I am one who's interested in Part-15. Others here are two. It's a great entry way for some into LF, plus the challenge of QRP comms. So let's not make it "out lawed"--just now.
Further, would Warren hold forth on QRP in general? I hope not. It's a lively community out on 80 and 40.
How about a kool-off time on "piss" jibes. No need for a ":=))" here.
Peter -- QRP Away!
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list