[Lowfer] TAG PSK31 185.800

[Jay Rusgrove]

John

Yeah..there's no falling asleep between characters with PSK31.=20

The 185 kHz range has not been particularly quiet at my location this =
season so copy would be even better at a quiet location. We'll see if =
the "Snagulator" makes it through the day without a hiccup.

Roger on the 1 watt output. Wonder if the FCC would consider a change?

Jay
=20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: John Andrews=20
  To: lowfer@mailman.qth.net=20
  Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 8:53 AM
  Subject: Re: [Lowfer] TAG PSK31 185.800


  Jay,

  >Very nice copy even with some residual static still this morning.

  Amazing. Not bad for 71 miles. And I would expect the static levels to =
drop
  during the day as that storm gets farther away.

  >The captures do not do it justice - you really have to be there =
watching
  the characters marching across the screen!<

  Kind of fast, compared to what we're used to! The PA creates a really =
dirty
  signal, though. Sounds funny in the receiver -- I'm not used to =
hearing the
  sharp edges on PSK31. But I guess no damage is being done at 1 watt. =
It
  would be really nice if the Part 15 rules specified OUTPUT power!

  John A.


  _______________________________________________
  From the Lowfer mailing list
  Send messages to: Lowfer@mailman.qth.net
  To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---