[LogPlus] The End

[pa9jj at home.nl]

Why not use Logger32?
It is freeware and has a good operating reflector.
The programme can be found on:

http://www.kc4elo.com/


On 17 Sep 2004 at 3:20, Eugene A.Kostromin wrote:

> Hello  Jose
> 
> 17/09/2004 you wrote :
> 
> JERS> Hi
> JERS> Iam running Logplus Version 4.7 in Windows XP 
Professional
> JERS> in a Pentium 3 at 1 Ghz and 256 MB of RAM.
> JERS> No problem whatsoever.
> 
> JERS> (Its a real pain to change to another Logging program and 
have
> JERS> all those DXCC Challenge and other Awards overall 
correct now
> JERS> that I have Logplus working as I need, Hi !).
> 
> JERS> 73   Jose  CT1EEB
> 
> I am happy to have this reflector is still living.
> Main problem for all of us is, that Bob do not working anymore 
over
> the Logplus. I have my LOGPlus V4.12 and using this programm 
still
> 1994 with QSOs (big job!!) still 1984  and main DXs still 1964 (my
> first steps). I have 352 DXCC countries confirmed and almost 
2700 in
> DXCC CHallenge, 8BWAZ (35 on 160) and etc.... All this 
statistics is
> in LOGPLUS database. I am using two computers - PT1 150 MHz 
with Win98
> and Notebook pt3 800MHz with also 98. Logplus working also in 
Win 2000
> ME for me in my sons computer (ZIPFiles). But mr. Microsoft is 
going
> faster and faster and I need more modern computer - now I have 
my next
> - PT4 with Win 2000 NT PRO and LOGPLUS is not working - no 
DOS inside.
> Now I am thinking about Microsoft 2005. What happens? If I like
> LOGPLUS, I need to have old computers all my future HAM life, 
hi. It
> is good for museum, also I need old radio and old antenna
> rotors,etc... I have tryed few more popular programms, like 
DX4Win,
> Logger 32, Log-EQF for Win, DXBase 2005, MixW2, few other 
little
> programms and may say, that LOGPLus is better for me. More 
convinient,
> friendly interface, much more statistics, then in others and very 
easy
> to see it, many other futures in one programm. (But maybe it is
> because of DEMO versions????) And in each case I will lose all 
my
> award base. So, I am not a programmer, only computer user and 
maybe, I
> am making mistakes with an installing LOGPlus into Win 2000 
NT, I will
> try to find a way, but I know, that LOGPlus is DOS needed 
programm and
> no DOS inside my new computer. Another way - Bob is my friend 
and I
> will try to ask him give me his main programm files and then I will
> ask some of my friends in HAM radio russian programmers to 
continue
> Bobs work over Logplus. Maybe it will coast some maney, but if 
LOGPlus
> is still popular, money will come back, I hope. Now a question - 
who
> will go with me to N7XR - he is not in this reflector, I think, but I
> have many friens in Seattle area to ask them for support.
> 
> 73!
> 
> >>
> >> > Hello Logplus users.
> >> > If this reflector is still active, I have a question:
> >> > Has somebody an experiance with an installing LOGPLUS 
V4
> >> > in Windows 2000 NT PRO?
> >> > It is not working with my Pent.IV 1600 MHz.
> >> > No DOS!?
> >> >
> >> > Good luck  UA4RZ
> Good luck  UA4RZ
> Eugene A. Kostromin
> ua4rz at tbit.ru
> http://www.qsl.net/ua4rz/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LogPlus mailing list
> LogPlus at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logplus



73's de
Jan
PA4JJ

pa4jj at qsl.net