[Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
Mel
[email protected]
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:32:26 -0500
The way to fix this is with the advanced DB functions which can change
all occurrences of the incorrect data... Or add the wrong value to the
table... Ie Quebec should match PQ or QC because the ARRL has used both
at different times.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Julio Peralta
> Sent: January 16, 2004 22:58
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RE: [Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
>
>
> The problem Dennis found in my upgrade to LOGic 7 was the
> data base for ARRL section was missing and had to be brought
> over from ver 6. I had the same problem with the IOTA data
> base just plain not there. The problem with VE providence was
> the new changes caused 2 different providences not to find a match.
>
> Julio, W4HY
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arthur Tan" <[email protected]>
> To: "LOGic" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 4:00 PM
> Subject: Re: RE: [Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
>
>
> > Hi Gil,
> >
> > From rojomn:
> >
> > > Why do the rejects occur. It does not make sense to me
> that they are
> > > accepted in one version and not in another? What am I
> missing here?
> >
> > I think that asome point there were probably changes made
> to the ARRL
> > SECT and VE PROV list in LOGic 6 to conform to the (ever-changing)
> > changes in such data. LOGic 7's lists are composed of the
> non-changed
> > data, thus there are differences and rejects occur. KN6RO proposes
> > the quick and easy fix.
> >
> > 73, Art AB4RL
> > _______________________________________________
> > LOGic mailing list
> > [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>