[ILQSO] Re: 75 m SSB freqs

[dpease at adams.net]

I have always thought lower in the band on 75 gets better as far as the 
problems with "pork producers". I didn't pay any attention to the new 
bandplan, how low is the bottom of the General calls sub-band now? 

Danny  NG9R 


James Funk writes: 

> SSB?  What's that?  :) 
> 
> Chime, in phone guys.  I hadn't even thought about it.  We really should
> assess this for next year for all the bands. 
> 
> Thanks, Chuck.  73, Jim N9JF 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ilqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:ilqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of KI9A at aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 7:09 AM
> To: ilqso at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [ILQSO] 75 m SSB freqs 
> 
> Gang- 
> 
> Dunno why I just thought of this,  but are we going to stay around the 
> traditional 75m SSB freq this year?   
> 
> I'm thinking I am going a bit lower this year, with the new expanded
> band 
> plan.  
> 
> Anyone else think of this?? 
> 
> CU Sunday! 
> 
> 73-Chuck  KI9A   
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's new at
> http://www.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> ILQP webpage:
> http://www.w9awe.org/ILQP.html
> list administrator is Danny NG9R
> for list problems contact ng9r at arrl.net
> _______________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> ILQP webpage:
> http://www.w9awe.org/ILQP.html
> list administrator is Danny NG9R
> for list problems contact ng9r at arrl.net
 


Danny Pease
dpease at adams.net 

.......................................................
Sent using Adams WebMail  ---  http://webmail.adams.net
Adams NetWorks -- Keeping you well-connected worldwide!