[ILQSO] Re: New Mobile Rules

[John Geiger]

Kind of like how you don't actually have to be in some counties to get them
to count towards the county hunters award?

73s John AA5JG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peg Haese KB9LIE" <kb9lie at yahoo.com>
To: <ilqso at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: [ILQSO] Re: New Mobile Rules


> Actually I feel this is a step in the right direction towards
> eliminating county-line operations altogether (dream on, Peg). Why
> should an operator be able to claim credit for putting out a county and
> claiming double or more points when he's not REALLY there? Been there,
> done that, couldn't even say the antenna was in the adjoining counties.
> But the ILQP rules allowed it, and still do. The group that sponsors
> the contest gets to make the rules.
>
> In other state QSO parties, the top single mobile operator has a good
> chance of winning (like in Wisconsin for instance). That's because
> other stations don't have inflated scores.
>
> 73 de Peg KB9LIE just over the state line in WI
> usually operating portable from Carroll Co. for the ILQP
> have operated mobile and from a 3-county line
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
________
> Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
> _______________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> ILQP webpage:
> http://www.w9awe.org/ILQP.html
> list administrator is Danny NG9R
> for list problems contact ng9r at arrl.net
>