[ICOM] Icom FL-44A and Inrad #109

Adam Farson farson at shaw.ca
Mon Jul 11 04:16:46 EDT 2005


Hi Lars,

The Inrad 109 is mechanically and electrically interchangeable with the
FL-44A.  http://www.qth.com/inrad/ The 109 has a -6/-60dB shape factor of
1.6 max., as compared to 1.75 for the FL-44A. 

http://www.qsl.net/icom/filters.html

The FL-109 is the best choice, as its bandwidth is similar to that of the
FL-80 9 MHz filter.

Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ


-----Original Message-----
From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On
Behalf Of Lars E. Pettersson
Sent: 11 July 2005 01:07
To: ICOM Reflector
Subject: [ICOM] Icom FL-44A and Inrad #109

I was looking for a replacement for the FL44A filter used in Icom
R70/71/751/etc, as this filter seem to be out of production, and stumbled
upon a description on how to install a FL44A at
http://www.mods.dk/view.php?ArticleId=2495. In the text they mention that
"If you do not like FL44A, you may consider using INRAD #109, which will
give you a slightly better shape factor."

Anyone here that knows what difference there are between the FL44A and the
Inrad #109? Or perhaps another of their filters would be better to use as a
replacement for the FL44A?

If one was to order this filter from Inrad, any other filter from them you
recommend for an Icom IC-R71?

73 de Lars, sm6rpz
--
Lars E. Pettersson <lars at homer.se>
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC, icom-owner at mailman.qth.net Icom Users
Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/


Scanned by WinProxy
http://www.Ositis.com/


More information about the Icom mailing list