[Fists] Keynot response - ref. p13 & QRS
Steve W0OOW
w0oow at piperscreek.com
Wed Jul 14 22:10:26 EDT 2004
Dear Nancy:
I just read with dismay the two articles in Keynote about FISTS members that
did not want to QRS. To the writers of the two letters, I apologize on
behalf of all hams that will and/or know how to QRS. Don't let a few
arrogant types drive you away. One of the best CW ops I know - solid at 65+
will slow down for you. But, there are a few that won't. Fortunately, they
do not represent all of us.
A QSO that sticks in my mind was one that I had on 15 meter CW some years
back. The person I talked to was from North Carolina, traveling through
South Carolina at the time (mobile CW of course), and headed to Florida. We
must have talked 1 & 1/2 hours. That man did not go a lick above 15 WPM,
but he was very solid. Yes, I slowed down for him. It was the most
enjoyable, relaxed, and memorable QSO I have had in all of my years.
Slow does not equate to bad in the same way that fast does not equate to
good. CW is just a form of speech. Since when does fast speaking yield
anything but poor relations? If a person is solid at 65 WPM - super. If a
person is comfortable at 8 WPM, so be it. People have different talents and
desires. Also, you have to operate where you are comfortable. So, what is
the matter with slowing down for someone?
A FISTS member ought to not only know better than for be an arrogant CW op,
a FISTS member should strive to set an example of what a good op is like.
Perhaps a change in bylaws is in order. How about if a set number of bad
reports come in, dropping a member from FISTS?
Think about this: IF A NOMINATION FOR FISTS WERE REQUIRED, WOULD ANYONE
NOMINATE YOU?
A person shouldn't even have to ask for someone to slow down! A good
operator should do that automatically. Arrogance (by refusing to slow down)
is not the sign of a good operator.
At least that is the view from Southeast Nebraska & 40+ years on CW
73,
Steve - W0OOW, FISTS #7808
More information about the Fists
mailing list