[Elecraft] K3 & ADAT ADT-200A by HB9CBU
Bill W4ZV
btippett at alum.mit.edu
Thu Dec 4 14:23:50 EST 2008
Nico, this is truly exceptional phase noise performance! My sincerest
congratulations to you. Have you described how you achieved this somewhere?
73, Bill W4ZV
Nico Palermo, IV3NWV wrote:
>
> Bill,
> the phase noise of Perseus is as follow:
>
> Offset (kHz) 2 5 10 20 >50
> Phase Noise (dBc/Hz) -141 -145 -148 -151 <-155
>
> As a picture is worth one thousand words, see here for more:
>
> http://microtelecom.it/perseus/tests/Perseus-phasenoise.jpg
>
> To make the test, the phase noise of the source generator,
> a homebrew crystal oscillator, has been neglected and it has been assumed
> that all the phase noise was due to the receiver oscillator, which is a
> crystal
> oscillator too.
>
> A more realistic assumption is that the two oscillators, the source
> generator
> and the receiver LO, are contributing equally to the phase noise figure
> and
> in this
> case the performance of the receiver would be even 3 dB better.
> The figures indicated are thus worst case values.
>
> For offsets larger than 50 kHz the phase noise performance cannot be
> really
> measured as the prevailing source of noise is of thermal origin and the
> noise induced by the reciprocal mixing is below the receiver thermal noise
> floor.
>
> Now that you can compare the full table, it would be not difficult for you
> to conclude
> that even at 1 MHz offset, the blocking dynamic range of Perseus is
> greater
> than
> that of your receiver.
>
>
> 73
> Nico Palermo, IV3NWV
>
>
>>Would you tell us how Perseus compares in the following phase noise
>>performance?
>
>>The following table is from a post by Eric WA6HHQ in September 2007. I've
>>added the Flex 5000 based on measurements published after Eric's note:
>
>>http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/elecraft/2007-September/073931.html
>
>>"Here are transmit composite phase noise numbers from the Lab for the K3.
>>Needless to say, we are pleased with the results. :-) I've also included
>>some numbers from the ARRL reviews for several late model rigs.
>
>>Rig 1kHz 2 10 20 50 100 1M
>>K3 -110 -119 -136 -140 -143 -144 -150
>>IC7800 -103 -112 -130 -138 -140 -140 -140
>>FT2000 -102 -105 -128 -129 -128 -128 -128
>>ORION 2 -121 -129 -126 -125 -118 -128 -138
>>OMNI 7 -102 -103 -120 -123 -127 -129 -126"
>>F5000 -123 (same at all spacings de W4ZV)
>>Perseus ?
>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K3---ADAT-ADT-200A-by-HB9CBU-tp1597981p1614902.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list