[Elecraft] Re: CX Report

[N2TK, Tony]

I am sure we can have many points of view on this topic. I happen to be in
the group that says let's enjoy contests and try to get as much activity as
possible, regardless of the mode.
Hey, there is always 12, 17 and 30M for non-contesters.
Also, you may want to read what Hollingsworth said at Dayton about contests
and contesters. 

73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Sandy
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 8:46 PM
To: David Thompson
Cc: boatanchors at mailman.qth.net; Elecraft List; Glowbugs reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: CX Report

There has been an IARU bandplan that just came out.  NOW is the time to 
support it and restrict contests to the sectors that are befitting the mode.

The RTTY guys run rampant all over the band and are making HF comms "hell" 
for others who would like a piece of the pie too.  This will get worse as 
modes like CW and AM become "obsolete" in their eyes.

There IS a simple solution:  retrict the contests to a small slice of the 
band.  Assign monitoring stations to list those that stray out of these 
"assigned segments".  The "penalty" would be disqualification of log for 
those who do so.  This would require that ARRL, IARU, RSGB and others stand 
by these standards so that the contesters would not monopolize the WHOLE 
band with their "fun"!

There is no reason why the contests shouild take up the whole CW or whole 
SSB segments or RTTY should run rampant over the entire band during the 
contests.

I am mainly a QRP contester, but the QRP folks have taken steps to usually 
restrict their contests to narrow segments of the CW bands to avoid stepping

on the toes of those who wish not to participate.

Does this proposal make any sense to your folks out there?

73,

Sandy W5TVW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com>
To: <ebjr37 at charter.net>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: CX Report


> Sandy,
>
> I was working the YL/OM phone a few years ago and calling CQ YL and at 0Z
> the North American Sprint came on.  These guys tried to steam roll me.
> K0GAS (a YL) worked me so I would give her a sprint QSO.  Moved to 40 to 
> get
> away from them.
>
> This year I was working the QCWA party and had to move to SSB from CW as
> some RTTY contest came on and wiped out the CW bands.
>
> A few years ago the State QSO parties almost died
> as W5NQR/NQQ ran the LA one and I and K4BAI the GA one and almost no one
> came.  Now they and those sprints are all over plus there is a RTTY one
> every weekend now (I am on the writelog reflector so I see posts about
> them).  Some hams do 2 contests a weekend EVERY weekend and now those
> sprints are weeknights.
>
> I first entered the ARRL SS in 1958 so I have been around for years and
> quiet QSO parties such as CX and QCWA are being pushed off the map.  Too
> bad.
>
> What to do?  I have complained to the three or four people who CONTROL
> contests and they laugh me off. CQ and ARRL just look the other way.
> And as you probably remember I run the CQ 160 Contests.
>
> 73 Dave K4JRB
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.4/1057 - Release Date: 10/8/2007

> 9:04 AM
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com